Asynchronous communication (Issues, PRs, Google Docs, and sometimes Slack) should be the default, reserving more synchronous media (like video calls and in-person meetings) for the types of conversations that uniquely benefit from their higher fidelity (brainstorming, whiteboarding, interpersonal conflict, social connection, etc.). Put another way, the phrase “async first” should be taken literally.
Default to transferring context asynchronously
When starting up a new initiative or collaborating with a colleague for the first time, it’s often tempting to “throw some time on their calendar” to “kick things off”. Such kickoff meetings often consist primarily of an information download, sharing context from one coworker to another with a specific call to action or request for feedback. But information transfer isn’t always the best use of synchronous time, especially when you consider the overhead of scheduling (especially across time zones), scaling (O(n) vs O(1)), and memorializing outcomes (as durable artifacts available to others). Not to mention, people learn differently. Not everyone absorbs information best by voice and in real time.
Instead, next time, consider transferring that context asynchronously (as a GitHub issue or Google Doc, for example), and then scheduling a meeting only if the conversation requires it. You’d be surprised how often it doesn’t. A few minutes of reading or a few comments on an issue or Google Doc can often replace waiting days for mutual availability and a dedicated 30-minute block of time. In this sense, you can think of meetings as a point of escalation based on complexity, not as the default starting point for a workstream, initiative, or conversation.
Meetings are not where work happens
Working asynchronously by default makes your culture more inclusive, makes decisions discoverable and permanent, creates space for learning, gives people better work-life balance, and produces better outcomes, faster. Async is also the key to making remote work, work.
Hold colleagues to async first
If you receive a meeting invite (or if a colleague requests permission to send you a meeting invite) without context, an agenda, or a read-ahead doc, consider politely declining, or at least asking for one. It’s well within your rights (you can even link to this post as a “get out of jail meeting free” card). After all, if the person requesting the meeting hasn’t taken the time to distill their thoughts into writing, why should they be able to decide how you spend your own time?
