I’ve written before about how we should treat prose and data with the same respect that developers treat code and how Jekyll forces you to do just that, but there’s another workflow that version-controlled, collaborative content enables: continuous integration.
Continuous integration (CI) is the idea that for every change, whether proposed or realized, a standard battery of tests run, to confirm the change does what you intend it to do. In most developer tools, like GitHub, you get instant feedback, in the form of a green light, to let you know that that is in fact the case, or a red light, in the event that something went awry, detailing exactly what doesn’t match you specified expectations.
When you treat content as code, you get the opportunity to co-opt best-of-breed developer workflows, and continuous integration is no exception. We’ve all been there. You make a simple change and end up breaking two or three other things. Links get out of date. Images move. Imagine if every time you made a change, all those things that you consciously or subconsciously worry about were automatically checked. Are my links accurate? Did any of my images break? Does this darn thing actually render the way I want it to?
With CI services like Travis CI, whether public or private, adding continuous integration to a repository of prose content, whether an entire website or a collection of HTML or Markdown files becomes trivial, especially when you use open source tools like HTML Proofer.
Checking links and images
Let’s say you have a Jekyll site, versioned on GitHub and published on GitHub Pages, and you’d like Travis to give your content a quick checkup every time you make a change. First, you’ll want to add the following to your site’s
group :test do gem 'html-proofer' gem 'rake' end
Next, create a file called
Rakefile in your site’s root, and add the following:
require 'html/proofer' task :test do sh "bundle exec jekyll build" HTML::Proofer.new("./_site").run end
After that, you’ll want to configure Travis by adding a
.travis.yml file with the following contents:
language: ruby script: "rake test" # You may need to use "bundle exec rake test" if Travis fails on the require for the HTML/Proofer
And finally, you need to head over to travis-ci.org/profile to enable Travis for your repository.
You can see this in action on this site. Each time I make a change (or someone proposes one), every link and image is checked to confirm nothing broke. You’ll get something that looks like:
Running ["ScriptCheck", "LinkCheck", "ImageCheck"] checks on ./_site on *.html... Checking 1187 external links... Ran on 120 files! HTML-Proofer finished successfully.
And with that, you can merge confidently.
Beyond “does this thing work?”
Having accurate links and images is a great baseline (that sadly, as I’ve learned through my own continuous integration, many sites don’t check), but what about checking the things you can’t see like accessibility? In the case of §508 compliance, I wrote Ra11y, but automated tools exist to check all sorts of things.
If you regularly author content for the web, especially if it’s collaborative, I’d encourage you to take a look at what developer tools and philosophies your can co-opt for your own workflows, CI or otherwise. You content deserves it.
Prior to GitHub, Ben was a member of the inaugural class of Presidential Innovation Fellows where he served as entrepreneur in residence reimagining the role of technology in brokering the relationship between citizens and government. Ben has also served as a Fellow in the Office of the US Chief Information Officer within the Executive Office of the President where he was instrumental in drafting the President’s Digital Strategy and Open Data Policy, on the SoftWare Automation and Technology (SWAT) Team, the White House’s first and only agile development team, and as a New Media Fellow, in the Federal Communications Commission’s Office of the Managing Director. His paper, Towards a More Agile Government was published in the Public Contract Law Journal, arguing that Federal IT Procurement should be more amenable to modern, agile development methods. More about the author →