Ben Balter
@benbalter
@benbalter
Source disclosed ≠ open source. If you publish code w/o fostering community involvement, you're gonna have a bad time http://ben.balter.com/2014/09/29/source-disclosed-%E2%89%A0-open-source/
❗ Heads up! This Tweet is archived and here for historical purposes. It may no longer be accurate or reflect my views. Proceed at your own risk.
If you enjoyed this tweet, you might also enjoy:
- “The superficial promise of open source is that if you publish your code...
- "The default position of @18F… is to use… Open Source Software,… [develo...
- Why open source? 25 reasons why you and your employer should consume, pu...
- Open source maintainers: if you had a robot that helped you maintain you...
- In case you missed it (or even if you didn't) I wrote up my WordCamp DC ...
- As open source projects grow, maintainers shift from the technical to th...
- Do open source developers contribute to open source for the lulz? So oth...
- Survey: 80% of enterprise uses open source; 2/3 contribute code upstream...
- Long Weekend Project: Open Source for Gov. -- A collaborative resource f...
- GitHub now shows what open source license, if any, a project is licensed...
- Interested in learning about GitHub's approach to empowering maintainers...