Being a lawyer and a developer, it can be frusting to see great collaboration tools like version control being snubbed, in favor of the lowest common collaborative denominator: emailing Microsoft Word documents with ambiguously versioned file names.
At GitHub we use Git and the pull request flow to collaborate on everything, not just software, but working with government agencies and outside counsel, we’re often forced to fall back to “the old way” of doing things. You’d be hard pressed to find a better way to troll a developer than to swap out things like distributed version control for in-document tracked changes emailed back and forth.
What did you change in the last round of redlines? How do I know you didn’t just turn off track changes and make me promise to sell you my soul? How can my coworkers propose a change to the document? What metadata am I inadvertently sending to you in this black box? Why is there all this formatting noise for such as simple change? And most importantly, what happens when the file inevitably becomes corrupt?
Geeks solved this problem decades ago. It’s called version control. We know that if so much as a single character is off, entire programs come crashing to a halt. That’s why we have evolved collaboration tools like Git, to track every change, both proposed or realized, from both internal and external collaborators, but, the business world hasn’t followed quite the same path for various reasons. That’s where Word Diff comes in.
Let say you’re working on a Word Document, and have made three rounds of changes, committing the file to a Git repository after each round. Your change history might look something like this:
Normally, if you were to try to view a single commit to review what’s changed, due to Word’s black-box nature, the best you could get would likely be something like this:
That’s because, despite its widespread adoption, a Microsoft Word documents is, in reality, a proprietary and purpose-built legacy format, and one that that’s especially hard to use outside of Microsoft Word. And that’s the exact problem Word Diff aims to sovle.
Word Diff empowers you to be a Markdown person in a Microsoft Word world.
As you work, Word Diff sits on a server (in my case Heroku), waiting for you to push your changes. When you do, it springs into action, automatically converting the Word document to Markdown after each commit:
You’ll notice that for each change I made to
important-file.docx, Word Diff made that same change to
important-file.md, crediting me as the author, and preserving my original commit message, as it transparently committed an updated Markdown file to the repository after each change to the Word document. That way Git functions you’re used to — like blame and a file’s commit history — work just as you’d expect.
If you were to click the first commit, you’d see exactly what was changed, without the need to download a large, proprietary file; leave the safety and comfort of your browser; or fire up slow desktop software:
But last February, GitHub introduced rendered prose diffs to better visualize changes to human-readable text. If we click on the second commit, you can see exactly what content was changed in its rendered form:
Heck, you could even do a split diff if you really wanted to dig into things:
At each iteration, I simply committed the Word document (either via command line, or via the visual interface of GitHub for Mac/Windows), and Word Diff silently took care of the rest. I never touched the Markdown file (or bothered to convert things to Markdown myself).
When would you use this? Lets say you’re collaborating on a document with someone. Normally, you’d email Word documents with tracked changes back and forth (or use real-time collaborative editing tools that don’t really capture process). With Word Diff you can use Git’s native cryptographic diff functionality - which ensures the authenticity and integrity of a document - to quickly verify what’s changed in a given iteration, or compare different versions of the document over time, all with a single click.
More importantly, you can collaborate using the simple tools you love like Markdown and Git, all the while, the person you’re collaborating with will be none the wiser (using something like Pandoc or LibreOffice to convert things back to Word, if you must).
It’s still a bit rough around the edges, but if you’re interested in giving it a try, you can follow these instructions to set up your own instance of Word Diff, or can take a peek under the hood by looking at the Word to Markdown Ruby Gem. This is very much just the start. I’d love your feedback (and help making it better).
Named one of the top 25 most influential people in government and technology and Fed 50’s Disruptor of the Year, described by the US Chief Technology Officer as one of “the baddest of the badass innovators,” and winner of the Open Source People’s Choice Award, Ben Balter is a Product Manager manager at GitHub, the world’s largest software development network, where he oversees a team of product managers responsible for the company’s business-to-business and community and safety products. Previously, Ben served as GitHub’s Government Evangelist, leading the efforts to encourage government at all levels to adopt open source philosophies for code, for data, and for policy development. More about the author →